Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Reading up on the Red Planet
Monday, February 26, 2007
The Face
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Collecting Moonlight
WOW, check it out!!
A quick blurb about a permanent Lunar Base
Buzz Aldrin Weighs in on New Moon Mission
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Phoenix Lander Nearing Launch Date
Go to Mars Now
Thursday, February 22, 2007
What to wear on Mars
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Postcards
Friday, February 16, 2007
Delicious Martian Food
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Galactic Ghouls
Meh 2 outta 4 stars
Geologists are funny people.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Mars in Literature
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Something to do this weekend
Mars photos
Mars Exhibit Opens in South Carolina
Saturday, February 10, 2007
The First Martian Settlement
Friday, February 9, 2007
Soundtrack for Mars
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Speak Martian
Astronaut Love Triangle Highlights Mars Mission Challenge: Avoiding Crazy on Long Flights
Astronaut Love Triangle Highlights Mars Mission Challenge: Avoiding Crazy on Long Flights
Martian wine
Psych Tests Reevaluated
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
Martian Calendar
Mars Colonization? Elementary!
Here is a power point presentation done by a fifth grade class on a Mars colonization project. Their project is very similar to one I worked on in fifth grade called Marsville or something. The idea is that the fifth graders think about techniques and problems associated with colonizing Mars: food, acclimatization, mental health, etc. are all considered carefully.
I immediately thought, "Wow,they're already training the first generation of colonists." Anyway, I wonder if anyone else in the class worked on a Mars project in elementary school and if the money doesn't come from the Mars Society. If there's any place to start grooming culture toward accepting Mars colonization as a real and legitimate venture, the elementary school is it.
Lisa
"Nowak was merely an astronut who went moonie loonie. Now she can go on a true long voyage into the void. A prison cell and a space station have a lot in common. Anyone who thinks space travel is more glorious has swallowed too much Tang.
There is no valid reason to send people into space. The Sci Fi writers never tallied the huge cost of sending people “out there” or the exponential difficulty of creating self-supporting colonies in places that make the Sahara look like paradise. Unmanned craft work better and do not risk lives. In fact, better to get our scientists and engineers to think up ways to rely less on fossil fuels and make our “spaceship earth” more sustainable. Folks longing to see Mars can go to Natural Arches in Utah and see a version that is more beautiful, less lethal, and does not cost billions or a 4-year trip to see."
"Space travel is one of humanity’s greatest endeavors and greatest trials. It may be expensive, unbelievably difficult, and dangerous. However, in the pursuit of knowledge of the universe, such challenges must be met and overcome. Though it may not always line up with being “in the black” and budgetary “bottom lines,” the implications of space travel insofar as its power to unite humanity are truly staggering.When all of this is considered, it becomes clear that those who would look to take society to the stars must also hold themselves to a standard that is, for lack of a better word, higher. This includes ethics and a commitment to the very best of one’s nature. To have feelings for another is expected, to act on them in terms of adultery is questionable, but to strive to end another’s life as a result is inexcusable for any person. I do not find mitigation for this person’s actions by those who would use the oft-quoted phrase “a woman scorned.” Humanity can and must do better, otherwise we have no right to impose ourselves on anything other than our own already burdened planet. Please note that this also applies to the man who decided to cheat on his wife with his colleague."
Now, as for the second quote, the poster has clearly missed the fact that the man in question was in fact divorced, and thus not cheating.I see, from these and other responses to the situation, that there are two ways to look at this. One way is to see astronauts as real people, who, like all of us, are subject to stress and capable of actions and reactions which cannot be predicted or explained. We ought to cut astronauts a bit of slack especially, because despite the fact that they are good a stress, they lead exceptionally stressful lives.
From this viewpoint, no amount of psychological screening will be of help in the end; the best that can be done is to provide support and counseling, and perhaps monitoring. Problems with this are clearly that 1) astronauts will not always allow themselves to be counseled or admit to problems, for fear of not getting to fly. 2) Any sort of monitoring of astronaut behavior seems a bit of a disturbing notion. Astronauts in situations such as a human mission to Mars would need to be governed and restricted and watched more closely than any other human beings in other situations, if you're taking this view. Does NASA need to become a military organization? I hope not...
The other view to take is that of the second quote; that human beings are flawed but capable of self-improvement and discipline. This view assumes that astronauts need to hold themselves to incredibly lofty standards under pressure, and simply "do better" than other people do. This, indeed, is what has always been done. As it is, this is just one of the risks of spaceflight, but it cannot be helped and spaceflight is worth it in spite of the risk. Even if now it comes to light that it is a system held together by spit.
Then, of course, there is the debate about the worth of spaceflight at all. On the one hand, it is the only frontier left to us, and it does have the power to inspire and unite. But, with the cost and the risk, I feel that this incident has caused many to question whether human beings are worthy to go into space. Problems will arise and people will occasionally "snap". If so, why spend millions and billions on a program where just one occurrence like this during a mission would mean the waste of all that money in one fell swoop, and probably other valuable lives? Do we really want to go out and do this, knowing that we are creatures subject to the illogic of our emotions, and that we risk everything on the mental and emotional integrity of our astronauts, when they are in an environment most suited to breaking that integrity down? Why not spend that money on renewable energy, or any other of the myriad of problems we can't seem to solve in our Earth-bound society?
Well, there is a valid point in that, I feel. We do have a responsibility to the planet we are on. Spaceflight is important, however, if only for the perspective it can give us. In any facet of human society, people are going to act in illogical ways, and cause problems. And I'd say that spaceflight is not the only situation in which the actions of one person could have dire repercussions.
Monday, February 5, 2007
Review of websites
Mars Society was more interesting. Since they are so firm in the belief that a mission to Mars is the most important thing mankind can do right now (personally, I think we might want to pay more attention to the planet we're on) they do seem a bit over-zealous. I was interested to learn, though, that there is an annual International Mars Society convention held at respectable universities. Such a thing would be fascinating to participate in. Mars Society might not be as all-important as they think they are, but I do think that it will help us get there someday. Anyone who devotes their time, effort and passion to such an endeavor can and probably will have an impact.
P.S. I will mention, too, that if Enterprise is going to try to convince us of the merits of Hyperdimensional Physics, it ought to finish construction of its "Ship's Library," where all the information is supposed to be.
Review on Mars Society and The Enterprise Mission
What is most helpful about the Mars Society website is all of the news feeds that are featured on the main page. It looks as though the website is updated very often with any and all news that is relevant to Mars or Mars exploration. It will definitely be a great resource for assignments and papers for this class. Good to know.
The Enterprise Mission website is a little hard to take seriously on first glance. It seems more of a science fiction show fan site than a credible source for information on Mars. Everything in one way or another makes reference to Star Trek. Maybe if I were a fan of the show I would think this were kind of cool. However, since I in no way am it just comes off as a little silly. What's more is that the first half of the page seems to be made up of advertisements of some kind which further contribute to its unprofessional and amateur nature. However, after scrolling past all of this the site turns into a resource for many interesting articles and papers about Mars. Many include actual photographs taken on Mars. So it turns out that this website is actually a lot more scholarly than it first appeared.
Website Reviews
This site was fun to navigate in that it allows us college students to see what other students are doing. The University Rover Challenge is asking students to compete for a $5000 prize and a seat at the 10th Annual Mars Society Conference. I like that this does site does college outreach since it will be the next generation (pardon the pun) who leads to voyage to Mars.
What I didn't like about this site is its insistence that members, even on a tertiary level, pay to view articles. I joined the Mars Society so that I could have access to articles but my membership only extends so far, actually I am not sure it got me anywhere. They want me to make a financial donation before they will allow to see more extensive records. I understand that this society relies heavily on donations but it also needs to think of those who do support the cause, who are interested, just broke.
The Enterprise Mission:
Firstly, this site loses credibility by aligning itself with a fictional TV show. While I enjoy science fiction and the interesting stories that have come out of this genre it is still fiction! This site wants to convince people that there was a Martian civilization at one point yet it pars up with one of the most unrealistic sci-fi shows out there? Not Buying it. I think The Enterprise Mission should have gone with a more stream-lined, independent campaign that separates itself from fiction. There "mission" of uncovering ancient Marian civilizations is already hard to swallow, it sounds fictional, therefore they should have distanced themselves from any and every form of preexisting fiction. Plus, half of their site is under construction, not very user friendly.
Sunday, February 4, 2007
Mars Society / Enterprise Mission
What I don't like about the Mars Society website is that their library, while it contains many credible articles, has a disclaimer that the Mars Society is not responsible for inaccuracies because the library isn't peer-reviewed. It seems to me that if the Mars Society wanted to be taken more seriously, they could start by having a research-worthy library. Another thing that bugs me is that their website is pretty sparse. It's mostly just a compilation of news and articles, with not very much information for the average internaute who wants to know more about the Mars Society but doesn't know what they're all about. After reading the mission statement, there's just nowhere to go. It would help if they had a section describing the specific goals they're trying to achieve.
That said, the Mars Society is like the Library of Congress compared to Richard Hoagland's website, Enterprise Mission. I think Hoagland is just a little to eager to interpret blurry photographs as signs of alien civilizations, or else he's been watching way too much X-Files. The references to 2012 alone are enough to make me roll my eyes; the fact that they're featured on the same website as all of this Martian conspiracy junk makes the whole thing downright laughable. I'm not sure how this whole thing plays into culture, but whereas the Mars Society contributes to a culture of curiosity and research, it seems to me that the Enterprise Mission contributes only to a culture of hasty judgments and alarmist conspiracy, something of which we have no shortage of in the world today. Maybe Hoagland really DID know too much, and NASA turned him into a raving lunatic so nobody would find out the "truth."
Enterprise Mission Review-"To boldly go where someone has gone before....."?
The argument is based on a few crucial assumptions and facts. First, Hoaglund openly assumes the "face on Mars" is humanoid (Hoaglund, 1989, "The Message of Cydonia). This assumption warrants further investigation into the landforms of the Cydonian desert. Some of the landforms there that do not resemble any part of the human body are supposedly Martian "pyramids." After extensive research and analysis of the landforms in the Cydonian desert, Hoaglund and his colleagues conclude that not only are the anomalous and evidence for ancient civilization, but also that they hold within them a secret code to deciphering an advanced "hyperdimensional physics." This is done using extensive measurements of the landforms and their relationships to one another and the star locations at the time they were supposedly created.
These images are food for thought, but the Enterprise Mission is more interesting to me as a conspiracy theory. The rhetoric of the mission relies heavily on a circa 1960 report by NASA known as the "Brookings Report." This is a report on the implications for humankind of contacting alien civilization. The report clearly states that making contact with extraterrestrial intelligence could be detrimental to the human race, and Enterprise Mission proponents use it as evidence for a NASA coverup of the truth about Cydonia. Reading the report makes it clear that NASA has worries about the results of "contact" but supporters of the Enterprise Mission find within it more than doubt. They use it to argue a conspiracy theory aimed at hiding any evidence of ETI, and the contents of the report are supposed to be more disturbing than the landforms themselves. Within the report, however, I found no clear evidence of coverup nor even a lack of objectivity. The Brookings report, like most reasonable minded approaches to SETI, expressed skepticism and a fair amount of moral support.
I thought, if the Brookings report were actually a coverup document aimed at an "extra-ordinary" conspiracy to hinder SETI, would I really be able to link straight to it from the Enterprise Mission site?
Saturday, February 3, 2007
The Planetary Society
Now, this sounds rather slick, and is a good stab at a piece of immortality for anyone who wants to include their name on the multimedia disk (which anyone is welcome to do). Should it actually work as planned, it would certainly be interesting, since views of history do change a good deal according to politics and the state of the world. No matter what young Martians will eventually learn about their planet and the blue-green star their ancestors came from, a time capsule from the Planetary Society would give them a very different perspective on that star, and themselves. Imagine if we uncovered such a thing, a message from people who considered us aliens, wishing us well.
A few of the problems with this scheme that I foresee:
1) Can we really expect that such a time capsule survives for as long as they think it will?
2) Especially if, as the website suggests is possible, Mars is Terra-formed and given a new atmosphere which contains oxygen? (They paint this idyllic picture of their disk just sitting out on a green Martian field, and a young Martian just strolling up and thinking, "By Jove. A relic." And picking it up.)
3) Most importantly: even if they get this disk to work for them, how likely is it that Martians of many generations in the future could understand our language?
If I had to bet, I would put all my money on English being the common Martian language once Mars does begin to be settled by permanent residents. English is truly the international language of today. More importantly, at this point the US is the most likely nation to go to Mars first, though it is more than conceivable that this could change. Martian colonists might start out by speaking Chinese. Yet no matter what they start with, after a few generations the language will have changed a bit. Perhaps more than a bit. Eventually, it is possible that interpreters will be required to translate between Martian and English.
If we reach a point where Mars is colonized, or further still, if it is an independent planet, I imagine that technology will be such that Earth will be very "small" and interconnected, in terms of communication and distance: even more so than today. It might even essentially be one entity, rather than a multitude of nations (not sure if I like the idea). In any case, the easier it is to talk and travel around the globe, the more languages we tend to lose. I hope many, many Earth languages other than English survive such an interconnected future age.
I think, though, that on Mars there will probably be only one language. Maybe not if two or more nations establish colonies and do not communicate (ie, US colony and Chinies colony). But it is a much smaller planet, and it will posses from the beginning the technology to speak across its globe. If there becomes a need for residents of Mars to work together and talk to each other, people will become bilingual, and/or one language will develop.
I also think, however, that there will be strong dialects in Martian. It might be rather like Japan: a somewhat compartmentalized society. There will be enough communication between colonies at first so that the language will remain common, but travel from one point on Mars to another will be difficult, given the harsh conditions. So until the planet is Terra-formed or transport becomes easy, colonies will be allowed to develop somewhat independently, and that will make for different Martian dialects.
Or I could be dead wrong.